Aug 9

When it comes time to evaluate major companies, only Apple and Nintendo seem to understand innovation. Both companies have strayed from the status quo and went their own way in hopes of doing something bigger and better. And both companies have succeeded.

“The rewards are in your head.”

“We had dreams that computers would improve education and improve communication and help us achieve a lot of tasks. A lot of us in our group understood it,” Woz told the crowd. “What we were doing was not (figuring out) how build a computer. It was how you get a computer that fits into the home. Price, looks–a lot of that stuff. It gave us more passion. We used the word ‘revolution’ all over the place.

Isn’t it ironic that when an innovative device is released like the Slingbox or a Harmony Universal Remote, the tech press and tech lovers themselves all swoon? Not at all. We swoon because we see something in those devices that don’t do what other products do. We swoon because we love this industry and we want to see it move forward and stop sitting in the mud hoping something will get it out. We swoon because those products are innovative and they do something most competitors don’t: they fail to toe the industry line and don’t put cash and revenue projections before risk and tangible reward.

What a joke. All that means is other products have been successful,silver jewelry, so other companies think they can be too. Newsflash: that rarely happens.

I hope that innovation, that simple premise that we see so little of today, will lead this industry forward and become the cornerstone of its development from now on.

At this week’s Intel Developer Forum, Steve Wozniak took the stage and discussed his career and his hope for the future of tech. All the while,OMEGA Watches, it had me thinking about what I would like to see happen in this brave, new world of technology and how I hope that derivative products don’t ruin this industry’s appeal to the mainstream.

I realize that sometimes components govern the success of a product and that it’s not always easy to innovate. But I think we’ve moved beyond the realm of excuses and most companies are more than willing to justify the release of products through the “trends in the industry.”

But for most other companies in the tech industry, innovation is either too costly or too unknown for them to move off the beaten path. More often than not, these companies let competitors innovate and use that technology to either mimic or slightly improve that original product.

The reality is this: the tech industry is dominated by companies that are willing to do something a bit more innovative and a bit more thoughtful of consumer desire. How many people are really buying that extra DVD player at Wal-Mart? How many people really want that run-of-the-mill home theater system or that ugly desktop that doesn’t break the mold in any way? The list goes on.

So here’s my call to every tech company and tech lover who has had enough of derivative products and boring ideas: start making products that are both innovative and unique, useful and affordable. Start making products that appeal to our desire for something new. And for goodness sake, start making products that buck the current trend. Only then will companies see real rewards and only then will they be able to maintain the kind of position Apple and Nintendo currently do.

As a person that loves technology and has dedicated his life to the covering, opining about, and using it, I hope Wozniak’s words inspire not just engineers, but companies that are looking to do special things. I hope that what Wozniak says so eloquently will resonate in the offices of Dell or the garages of companies we’ve never heard of before.

Check out Don’s Digital Home podcast, Twitter feed, and FriendFeed.

I understand business and I realize that companies have a vested interest in jumping in on the right markets and need to differentiate based on price or product. But I simply can’t understand why more won’t try to differentiate on product in a meaningful way.

As someone who literally immerses himself in the world of technology each day,wholesale jewelry, I have the opportunity to see and use products that companies are trying desperately to promote. And almost each day, I’m disappointed by what I see: the same basic premise for the given market with nary a consideration for what consumers are really looking for.

Set-top boxes are one of the worst culprits in the space. How many set-top boxes do we need before someone finally tells companies to stop? I understand streaming music and content throughout the home may be the future and people want to take content on their computer to their HDTVs, but can’t we see something a bit different? Can’t we see a company try to innovate off that idea and give us a product that deviates from the norm and doesn’t copy every other device in the space?

Aug 29

Demonstrating the integration of Facebook Connect using an internally created sample site called “The Run Around” (it logs workouts) as well as a smattering of examples from partners like Red Bull, Digg, Six Apart, and CBS (which publishes CNET News), Morin emphasized that it’s an extremely simple process for developers.

The Run Around, an app created by Facebook to test its Facebook Connect project.

(Credit:
Facebook)

Fewer went up when Morin then asked the crowd how many had used Facebook Connect, the company’s new data-portability initiative. It’s live now, he said.

LONDON–A lot of hands in the audience went up at the Future of Web Apps conference when Facebook senior platform manager Dave Morin kicked off his talk at the conference with the question “How many people have built something on Facebook Platform before?”

“If one of your friends did something on the Web, and you don’t know about it, did it actually happen?” Morin asked jokingly. But on a more serious note, Facebook Connect could be a formidable threat to social aggregators like FriendFeed if it’s deployed widely across the Web. But sites like FriendFeed simply rely on RSS (Really Simple Syndication). Facebook Connect requires active partnerships. That’s why Morin’s talk was such an important sales pitch for the company: the developer-heavy audience was full of the people whom Morin and his colleagues need to convert.

Though Facebook has a reputation for keeping its user data behind (virtual) closed doors, Morin said that’s the opposite of Facebook Connect’s aim. “We wanted to take down those walls and make you able to integrate Facebook anywhere on the Web in any way that you want,” he said, explaining that Facebook Connect has a trifold aim: transporting your Facebook identity, making your friends lists portable, and seeing detailed activity feeds from what your friends do across the Web.

Facebook unveiled Facebook Connect in May amid a flurry of other companies’ data-portability announcements, like Google’s Friend Connect and MySpace’s Data Availability, which has partners like Yahoo and eBay. A few Facebook Connect partners have rolled out already, and others have announced concrete plans–like blog network Gawker Media, which says that commenters will soon be able to use their Facebook log-in credentials.

As for privacy, something that has been a big topic for critics of data-portability projects, Morin said Facebook Connect will provide a benefit rather than a drawback. “What we’re trying to do here,” he said, “is putting the user fully in control. On Facebook, users have a robust set of privacy settings. With Facebook Connect, those privacy settings can transfer directly to your site. We think that’s really powerful.”

Aug 24

Real Deal 106: Copyright
How to navigate digital rights Listen:

For RSS readers: http://www.cnet.com/i/pod/realdeal.xml
iTunes: Subscribe

| Download
MP3

We talked with Vogele about this, and went over not just the legal doctrine that applies to digital content, but also some of the practical guidelines in dealing with infringement of rights (near the end). Play the podcast for this free lesson in modern copyright law.


If you want to join the ongoing discussion, come on over to the Real Deal forums.

Real Deal subscription links:

Today on the Real Deal podcast, Tom and I interviewed Colette Vogele, attorney, Fellow at Stanford’s Center for Internet and Society, and host of the Rules for the Revolution podcast. We started to cover the concept of copyright from the perspective of the content producer separately from that of the consumer, but found that the line between the two is increasingly fuzzy. We all consume content. But with digital technologies, almost every one of us also produces, copies, or otherwise mangles the content that we are consuming.

Aug 24

Customize XP’s common dialog boxes
To add new folder shortcuts in XP dialogs, click Start > Run, type gpedit.msc, and press Enter to open the Group Policy applet. Navigate in the left pane to User Configuration > Administrative Templates > Windows Components > Windows Explorer > Common Open File Dialog. Double-click Items displayed in Places Bar in the right pane, check Enabled in the resulting dialog box, and enter the folder paths in the five text fields below it.

Tomorrow: Get started faster in Ubuntu.

You can save time by writing down the paths to the five folders you want to add before opening Group Policy, and then keying them in one by one. Another catch: You have to enter five folder paths, or Windows adds a placeholder icon for each blank field that leads nowhere and can cause problems. Once you’ve entered paths in all five text boxes, click OK and exit Group Policy.

Select "More" under Favorite Links to view and select your custom folder locations in Vista's common dialog boxes.

Add the paths to your favorite storage folders to the Common Open File Dialog in Windows XP's Group Policy applet.

Add custom shortcuts to Open and Save dialog boxes in Vista
Adding folders to the Favorite Links list in Vista common dialog boxes is straight-forward. Start by opening Windows Explorer and navigating to the Links folder in your user profile. It’s likely located at “C:Users\your name\Links.” Right-click in the right pane, choose New > Shortcut, and either enter the folder path, or click Browse, navigate to and select the folder, and click OK. Then click Next, give the shortcut a name (or accept the default folder name), and click Finish. A faster way to create the shortcuts is to simply click and drag the folder’s icon into the right pane, and release it.

Create a shortcut to your favorite storage location in the Links folder of your user profile to add it to the Favorite Links in Vista common dialogs.

A few weeks ago I complained that I couldn’t figure out how to change the default location when opening or saving files in Windows’ great little Paint imaging utility. That one still eludes me, but I came up with an alternative approach that’s almost as fast: Put shortcuts in common dialogs to your favorite folders via XP’s Places Bar and Vista’s Favorite Links.

This part is a little tricky, because if you don’t know the path, you have to select the folder in Windows Explorer, copy the path in the address bar, and paste it into the Items displayed in the Places Bar Properties dialog box’s text fields one at a time. The problem is, as soon as you navigate away from that dialog box, it closes, so you have to double-click the entry in the Common Open File Dialog again to reopen it each time. (You can also find the folder path by right-clicking a shortcut to the folder, choosing Properties, and copying the path in the Target field.)

Use Microsoft's Tweak UI PowerToy for Windows XP to customize the shortcuts on the Places Bar in common dialog boxes.

A quicker way to customize the Places Bar in XP’s common dialog boxes is by using the free Tweak UI utility in Microsoft’s PowerToys collection. Simply open the program, choose Common Dialogs under Explorer in the left pane, check Custom places bar, and enter the folder paths, or select one of the folders on the drop-down menu. (Note that with Tweak UI, you can choose “none” on the drop-down menu without breaking anything, so you needn’t enter five locations.) Click OK when you’re done.

To access one of the folders on your custom list of shortcuts while in one of Vista’s Open and Save dialog boxes, click More under Favorite Links, and choose the folder from the drop-down menu that appears.

Aug 24

In the three short weeks since Toshiba announced that it was pulling the plug on the high-definition technology, prices for standalone players using the rival Blu-ray format have been headed north. In fact, as noted by PriceGrabber.com, Blu-ray prices are at their high point for the year, at an average of about $400 apiece for the devices. The Sony BDP-S300, for instance, was just a small mocha latte above that level, at $403 as of Wednesday.

Prices for Blu-ray players had been dipping down to around $300. Just last week, Sony Electronics President Stan Glasgow said that the company would be “at a $300 rate” through this year–and would even hit the $299 mark in 2008. Apparently, though, retail outlets haven’t gotten that message just yet. (Glasgow also allowed that the price might reach $200–next year.)

The Sony BDP-S300

You might also do well to heed the advice of TGDaily, which in musing about the Blu-ray price increases is also looking ahead to later this year when Blu-ray players gain some advanced features and the ability to connect to the Internet: “Many of the current Blu-ray manufacturers have announced new players that will support BD Profile 2.0, so my advice would be to buy a
PS3 or wait for the next-gen players.” (The PlayStation 3 game console offers Blu-ray and Internet connection already. But don’t go looking for Blu-ray on the Xbox 360.)

The demise of the HD DVD format has been bad news for both bargain hunters and at least one big-time technology company.

But if you’re still buying Blu-ray today and ruing having to shell out a few extra bucks, imagine how Toshiba feels. The consumer electronics giant, a leading backer of HD DVD, could see a whopping $986 million loss in its high-def DVD business for its current fiscal year, according to Japan’s Nikkei business daily. Correction: This sentence initially had a “b” instead of an “m” in the dollar value of the loss. The expected loss is $986 million.)

If you’re a penny-pincher who’s of a mind to buy technology on the endangered species list, you could of course go out and buy a $99 HD DVD player.

(Credit:
CNET Networks)

Aug 24

With SAP, you really have not seen innovation in the last 10 years. If you think about what is the one thing that SAP has ever innovated, what have they created that’s unique to the industry or value-added technology? I have a hard time thinking about what SAP is going to be known for at the end of the day.

Debate partners: Marc Benioff and Hasso Plattner

In August 2007, Plattner’s proxy, SAP CEO Henning Kagermann, characterized Salesforce.com as follows:

Benioff claimed that the Salesforce.com platform could run any kind of enterprise application. He asked Plattner why Salesforce.com beat out SAP for the Dupont business. “We had a shitty CRM system,” Plattner said. He then said that the new SAP CRM 7.0 is the best product in the field. “You had a good time and now we are. If you are really successful how much are you worth?” Plattner said.

Speaking of old, SAP was founded in 1972 and Salesforce.com in 1999. Salesforce.com is approaching $1 billion in annual revenue, and a much smaller margin than SAP, with its software-as-a-service platform and subscription business model. SAP has been slow to adopt the software-as-a-service model, but is prepping to launch Business ByDesign. It will be more directly competitive with NetSuite than Salesforce.com, which is built primarily around CRM applications.

MOUNTAIN VIEW, Calif.–Two titans in the enterprise software business faced off Thursday at a Churchill Club event at the Computer History Museum here, and a bit of history was made.

Plattner rambled on about betting on modification-free software with SAP R/3 in 1993, only to find that customers wanted to customize it. SAP’s plan today is to provide 2,100 service interfaces in Business ByDesign, its forthcoming hosted suite of applications for the mid-market. Those interfaces will mesh with each other but will not be customizable. He differentiated Business ByDesign from Salesforce.com by virtue of the completeness of the SAP suite. SAP has been working on Business ByDesign for four years with 2,500 developers on the project, and it won’t be generally available until later this year or 2009.

Plattner, who was writing software when Benioff was in grade school, wasn’t biting, and became a bit exercised. He questioned whether Salesforce.com could keep thousands of on-demand service interfaces consistent as its platform grows and as customers write code to integrate with the platform.

To put this debate in historical context, Benioff has been known to disparage SAP, which generated $15 billion in revenue for 2007 with a 26 percent margin, as a company that doesn’t innovate. In an interview with News.com’s Charlie Cooper and myself a few weeks ago, Benioff said:

For SAP, software is about serving larger businesses with a complete, integrated suite of applications with “wall-to-wall functionality,” Plattner said.

Benioff summarized the future of enterprise software during the debate in this statement: Software-as-a-service will not happen without Microsoft, Oracle, or SAP. But they are holding on to the past. The new Internet companies–Amazon, Google and ebay–what they have done and the new young internet companies is really the next generation.”

The evening started off more calmly, with Benioff describing the new generation of enterprise software companies, which he said will look more like consumer companies, such as Google, Yahoo, and eBay on the back end, but serve up traditional business functionality.

Fundamentally, companies will find it more practical and cost effective to deploy enterprise software from the cloud over the next decade. As I said earlier, Benioff won the debate, but he has a long way to go to unseat Plattner’s company.

In a moment of calm, Plattner said, “We have many things in common. Let me give you some advice, but you might not take it because you are younger: don’t overestimate your platform.” Sage advice.

(Credit:
Dan Farber)

The history footnote of the evening came from Benioff, who challenged Plattner to build SAP applications on the Salesforce.com platform. “I want to figure out how to get SAP to build on our platform,” Benioff said. “SAP needs to write its new apps on our platform, and I need to help him do that because there is no way he can figure that out…we will be in a war to get more developers on our platform.”

Salesforce is like best of breed in the old days. It’s always an advantage, but you cannot be best at everything worldwide. That’s our advantage–we can run an entire business.

“All 41,000 Salesforce customers are on the same version. When we release the new version in June, we don’t break the links. In some cases they have to re-implement, but you still have a managed environment,” Benioff countered.

As salesforce.com evolved from CRM to application platform, Benioff has been making that claim the client/server model is doomed. Plattner touted SAP’s developer community. “We have 1.2 million software developers on our platform, 2,000 partners developing addition software,” he said. “We have the largest software development project in our history, with 2,500 developers developing on demand,” Plattner added.

The sage, 64-year-old Hasso Plattner, co-founder and Chairman of SAP, and the upstart, 43-year-old Marc Benioff, co-founder and Chairman of salesforce.com, debated the future of enterprise software, fielding questions from Quentin Hardy of Forbes and the audience.

Plattner was asked if he would consider buying Salesforce.com. “It always makes sense to look into something. If the Apex platform (the Salesforce.com platform) is really as good a he thinks it is, we should look even more,” he said. Plattner also said that he thinks Oracle, where Benioff worked for 13 years, will end up acquiring Salesforce.com

Benioff, who I declare the debate winner by nontechnical knockout (no references to in-memory database systems), stuck to his vision of the future. “You have to buy into the fundamental premise that the world has to change, and because we have a global network and a new architecture with massively parallel servers, we can build technology with a level of automation previously unimaginable.

“You have 2,500 developers and 2,100 interfaces. All that and no customer success,” Benioff taunted.

“I would be scared at what you just said. If you extend that to whole enterprise system, I would be scared to death,” Plattner responded.

“We have many things in common. Let me give you some advice, but you might not take it because you are younger: don’t overestimate your platform.” –Hasso Plattner to Marc Benioff

Benioff said Salesforce.com is aimed at all sizes of companies and across industries. “We have been passionate about moving obstacles out of the way of the old enterprise software companies,” Benioff said. “We are at the verge of a breakthrough, and it is as big as the software-as-a-service business has been. We see platforms emerging where we can accept customers and ISV code and run it natively, just as R/3 ran natively on Oracle. This means you can run the business processes of any company in the world. We are moving now to platform-as-a-service, and it’s biggest the threat to SAP, MS, Oracle, and BEA architectures.”

Aug 24

For this and other instances, it’s helpful to have a dual-licensing strategy. In this way, customers get all the benefits of open source, especially the ability to view and modify source code to suit their particular needs, without the obligation to contribute back derivative works.

commentary

There are, however, instances in which an enterprise might well trigger the contribution requirement of open-source licensing. If a company sold off a division to another company, complete with the servers running modified open-source software, this would likely trigger a “distribution” and might well affect the value of the deal.

Unfortunately, this perpetuates the problem that Jim Whitehurst of Red Hat has been highlighting: the more software created in isolation, the greater the industry’s inefficiency and the higher the cost of software. Dual-licensing doesn’t solve this problem. It is, however, a good way to help guide enterprises into open source on comforting terms.

Most enterprises needn’t worry about the “viral” aspect of open-source licenses. Because most enterprises use software for internal purposes, rather than distribute it, they don’t trigger the standard open-source requirement to contribute back derivative works. A recent Federal Computer Week article by John Moore does an admirable job of clarifying this.

Aug 24

“The days of proprietary technology must come to an end,” [Vice Admiral Mark Edwards, deputy chief of naval operations for communications] said. “We will no longer accept systems that couple hardware, software and data.”

The US Navy just announced a bold IT policy: no more proprietary software:

Edwards goes on to suggest that staying ahead of the IT innovation game is a matter of national security. The same holds true for private enterprises: those that dump money into the trash can of proprietary software are doing themselves and their customers a disservice.

The reasons? Innovation and cost are considered superior when delivered by open source and open standards:

commentary

“We can’t accept the increasing costs of maintaining our present-day capabilities,” Edwards said. “In the civilian marketplace, it’s just the opposite. Some private-sector concerns are cutting their costs by 90 percent while expanding their performance.”

The open-source savvy shall inherit the earth.

Via John Scott’s blog.

Aug 24

At least within the Wall of Sheep room you can get help on how not be posted on the display wall. For example, use encryption on your wireless connection such as WPA2. That will encrypt the signal from your mobile device to the access point. From there, the network itself should run Secure Sockets Layer (SSL).

What they’re doing is passively monitoring the network traffic at Black Hat 2008. “We call it ‘High Availability Sniffing,’” Riverside said. They’re dangerously close to violating federal wiretapping laws, but they’re on the “good guys” side, he added. “We’ve had CSOs, CIOs stop in and see just how vulnerable their communications are at this conference.”

LAS VEGAS–How confident are you when using your laptop at a conference?

On Thursday, Riverside was addressing some hardware failures in a conference room at Caesars Palace. “We have redundancy,” he said. In the back of the room were various boxes and other electronic equipment and wires. In the past they’ve used their own equipment, although this year they’re starting to get donations. “We’re vendor agnostic,” said Riverside, adding that they are using Windows,
Mac, and various flavors of Linux.

“If the ‘Best of the Best’ in security can be exposed, think of the average users,” said Riverside, a member of Aries Security, a group that maintains the Wall of Sheep.

For most of the year, the individual members (of which there are about seven) are scattered across the country, working in security at various companies. But for two weeks they come together in Las Vegas to plan and mount their equipment, though not without glitches.

Click here for full coverage of Black Hat 2008.

To see what’s going across the Black Hat network, there are seats where you can plug in your own laptop and use whatever sniffer you have to see what they see. If they can see your network, they can see the clear text contents of your e-mail. “We don’t do decryption,” added Riverside. But, he quickly cautioned, he doesn’t know what anyone coming into the room might do with the data. Or, more likely, roaming the hallways, noting that the network is available for anyone to monitor.

Another thing Riverside recommends is to turn off all automatic connections to the Internet that fire up before you can establish a VPN connection. “Once on the VPN, you can open your chat or messaging apps.” Even then, you should only connect to trusted Web sites and inspect their certificate to make sure it’s valid. He said he’s seen one certificate that misspelled Verisign as the certificate authority.

For years, a group called Wall of Sheep has been showing attendees of Defcon when their network connections are insecure. The Wall of Sheep board has been a fixture at Defcon, Black Hat’s sister conference set to begin tomorrow at the Riviera Hotel and Casino. The board displays the names (with some identifying information obscured) of those connecting to the Internet in insecure ways. The idea is both meant to shame and educate users on best practices.

“And we’ve had people from three-letter agencies as well,” added CeDoxx, another Aries member. They do inspect their logs, so if someone says they’re with, say, the FBI, the Wall of Sheep will also see any Fail messages to rule out any bogus claims to greatness. At past Defcons, they’ve had pranksters flood the network with bogus claims just to slow down their work.

Aug 24

The
PlayStation 3 is the first Blu-ray player to support BD-Live functionality, thanks to a firmware update available today. Officially announced just last week, the update (version 2.20) was released right on schedule, and is now available as a free download to PS3 owners directly through the console’s onscreen interface. Once installed, it allows the PS3’s to access Internet-connected BD-Live content available on some discs. The list of compatible discs is currently minimal–just War and Saw IV available now, plus The Sixth Day and Walk Hard following on April 8–and the first round of BD-Live content doesn’t seem to be very diverting. But as the list of supporting titles grows–and, ideally, the BD-Live content becomes more compelling–look for players that don’t support Profile 2.0 compatibility to be confined to the clearance shelves. The PS3 remains the best bet for Blu-ray shoppers, even if they have no interest in using its gaming capabilities.

(Credit:
CNET)

The world's first 2.0-compatible Blu-ray player.

In addition to adding BD-Live support, the firmware upgrade includes a few other PS3 fixes and enhancements, including better DivX support and PSP integration. However, despite widespread rumors to the contrary, the update did not include the ability to copy portable versions of Blu-ray movies to the PSP. Audiophiles are also still holding out for an update that would add DTS-HD Master Audio decoding to the PS3, although Sony has not announced any plans to include that functionality.

So, what do you think, PS3 owners? Excited about the latest upgrade? Happy to be owning the best Blu-ray player out there? Or do you still want more? And for those who haven’t yet taken the Blu-ray plunge: does this upgrade make the PS3 a more compelling purchase? Share your thoughts below.

Aug 24

If you’re a heavy Pixelpipe user this is definitely worth a download. I only hope that in future versions it will let you toggle the services you want on and off from the sidebar itself, and without the user having to visit the site. I’d also like to see it add a little microblogging tool like it has on the site, so you could use it to send out a short message or blog post to multiple services.

Pixelpipe, the multi-service file uploader and metadata management tool, has a new experimental Firefox extension out that should delight its regular users. It adds a sidebar to your browser where you can simply drag and drop digital media from your hard drive or things you find on the Web to upload directly to your Pixelpipe account.

Previously: Pixelpipe lets you easily mass distribute media

Once you’ve picked all the items you want to upload, you hit a single button and it sends it off to Pixelpipe, which will instantly distribute it to all the services you have turned on by default. These can’t be edited right from the sidebar, but there’s a quick shortcut button that will take you to your settings page where you can turn certain services on or off.

(Credit:
CNET Networks)

You can also pick the privacy level of the upload to Pixelpipe itself, which can limit who is able to see what you’ve uploaded based on your relationship with them.

« Previous Entries